Private beta now open.Create account

Private beta · care fidelity for dementia programs

Know what care was intended. Prove what happened.

GentleNext combines working GUIDE navigation workflows with a research-mode evidence layer now in design-partner validation. Turn plans, assessments, contacts, and follow-up into source-linked review queues—without replacing clinical judgment or the EHR.

  • Proposed evidence workflow in design-partner validation
  • Human review before any material determination
  • No autonomous clinical or family-facing decisions

The care-fidelity preview below is synthetic and proposed. Current product demos show implemented navigator and family workflows.

Navigator console

GEN-Eleanor-B
HighStrain
GEN-Margaret-A
ModRespite cap
GEN-Walter-I
Mod-High
SOAP draft — awaiting review

Assessment

Caregiver strain elevated. No acute safety concern.

Approve
Edit

Family app

Today

Margaret has a doctor's visit Tuesday at 2:00 PM. Read the brief before you go.

From Priya, your navigator

Refill Donepezil at CVS

Before Tue, 2:00 PM

I need help now

Navigator console (left) + family PWA card (right).

Built for HIPAA-gated pilot readiness

  • Built for the CMS GUIDE Model

    G-code-aware billing, tier-aware cadence

  • HIPAA Business Associate posture

    BAA gates tracked before PHI pilots

  • Hash-chained audit log

    7-year retention, operator-verifiable

  • PHI never leaves the tenant

    Every query is scoped to your program and re-verified on every request

Dementia programs cannot improve care they cannot observe.

GUIDE creates a reachable first market. The larger problem is making multicomponent dementia care observable without turning navigators into research coordinators.

Care is recorded as notes, not intervention evidence.

A task can be complete while the intended component, dose, adaptation, and outcome remain invisible. Supervisors reconstruct delivery manually from assessments, calls, plans, and messages.

Source: Common dementia-care program definition, TRCI 2023

Missing documentation is indistinguishable from missing care.

A recent multi-site dementia intervention study found uneven fidelity and incomplete longitudinal enactment data. Without provenance, teams cannot tell whether delivery failed or the record did.

Source: ADS Plus fidelity study, 2026 (PMC12448453)

Program outcomes vary, but delivery is a black box.

Dementia-care trials report different effects across caregiver burden, quality of life, utilization, and context. A program label does not reveal which components reached which dyads.

Source: Care Ecosystem and D-CARE outcomes, 2024–2025

See the proposed evidence workflow →

Research-mode concept · synthetic preview

From care delivered to evidence you can defend.

GentleNext is being narrowed around a harder problem: knowing which dementia-care components were intended, what actually happened, and what still needs a qualified human to resolve.

  • Source-linked evidence. Every assertion retains the originating assessment, contact, task, or care-plan record.
  • Deterministic conformance. Versioned pathway rules—not a model's confidence—decide whether evidence is supported, missing, or indeterminate.
  • Human review required. AI may propose mappings; it does not make clinical, compliance, or family-facing decisions.
Bring us one evidence workflow

Evidence compiler preview

Caregiver-burden reassessment · GN-ZBI-R1 v0.1

Needs review

Intended care

Reassess caregiver burden, document the response, and record whether the care plan changed.

Source evidence

  1. ZBI-22 completed

    Assessment · Feb 14 · score and instrument version linked

    Supported
  2. Follow-up contact documented

    Contact log · Feb 18 · navigator and source record linked

    Supported
  3. Care-plan adaptation

    No source record satisfies the proposed pathway rule

    Needs review
Human review required: confirm whether the care plan was intentionally unchanged or the adaptation was not documented. This preview uses fictional data and is not a live clinical determination.

Proposed design-partner workflow

Start with deterministic evidence and human review. Earn the right to learn later.

  1. Program + clinical lead

    Defines intended care

    A versioned pathway names the trigger, component, responsible role, allowed adaptation, required evidence, and outcome window.

  2. Evidence compiler

    Links source evidence

    The system proposes mappings from assessments, contacts, tasks, and care plans while retaining the source record, rule version, and uncertainty.

  3. Qualified reviewer

    Adjudicates the gap

    Deterministic rules surface supported, missing, contradictory, and indeterminate components. A human resolves material ambiguity.

  4. Program + research team

    Measures delivery and outcomes

    Reviewed fidelity data can be linked to caregiver, beneficiary, operational, and economic outcomes. Adaptive policy work remains a later, separately governed stage.

Two apps. One case.

Navigators get a console. Families get a card.

GentleNext is one platform with two intentionally separate interfaces — because an RN building a care plan and a daughter reading it at 2am have completely different needs.

Navigator console

Dense, operational, keyboard-first.

The navigator sees a caseload table with burden-risk flags, overdue-cadence indicators, and tier classifications. Assessments, contact logs, escalation routing, and GUIDE-compliant documentation export are all one click away. The AI doc-assist produces a structured SOAP draft the navigator edits and approves before anything is filed.

  • Caseload with overdue-cadence and burden-risk flags
  • Structured ZBI / CDR / FAST assessment flow
  • Contact log → SOAP draft → navigator approval
  • Escalation routing to on-call clinician
  • Monthly DCMP billing export (G0519 / G0524 / G0526)

Audience: RN, LCSW, care coordinator — 4–8 hours/day at the screen, desktop-first.

Family PWA

Calm. One next step. No password.

The family caregiver opens a magic-link on her phone. She sees one sentence — what to do today, from her navigator by name. Large text, 56×56 tap targets, dark-mode default, no gamification. If something is wrong, one tap reaches a human.

  • Today card — one calm sentence, one primary action
  • Task board — coordinate siblings without group chats
  • Visit prep brief — one page before every doctor visit
  • Secure messages with the navigator
  • Urgent concern → human navigator (AI does not resolve); no measured callback SLA

Audience: family caregiver, age 55–75, short sessions, often late at night. No account creation — magic-link only.

How they connect: When a navigator logs a contact, updates a care plan, or publishes a visit-prep brief, the family sees it on their next open — not as a notification flood, but as a single updated card or task. The navigator is always named, and the family has a named navigator to reach.

What programs actually face

GentleNext is built around the situations that happen every week in GUIDE programs.

Newly diagnosed

Margaret was just diagnosed.

Sarah, her daughter, doesn't know what to do first. Priya, the navigator, enrolls the family, completes the ZBI, and publishes a single next step to the family app. Sarah sees it that evening.

Enrollment + ZBI: ~12 minutes. Sarah's first calm next step: same day.

Overdue reassessment

Six months have passed.

The ZBI is due. GentleNext surfaces it in Priya's caseload before it becomes a compliance gap. Priya schedules the call, documents the score, and the GUIDE reporting record updates automatically.

Surfaced 14 days before the cadence breach. Reporting record: instant.

Urgent concern

Sarah called 911 last night.

She opens the family app and taps 'I need help now.' The concern routes to the on-call navigator. AI does not answer, intercept, or close the contact — a human responds.

Routed to the on-call navigator in under 60 seconds. Callback timing is an operational program target — not a measured product SLA.

Visit prep

Appointment is next Tuesday.

Priya drafts a one-page brief: current medications, cognitive scores, and the three questions to ask the geriatrician. Sarah can read it or print it. No login required.

Draft: ~90 seconds (AI). Navigator review + publish: ~5 minutes. Sarah sees it: instant.

Software that respects both your navigators and your auditors.

Not a feature tour. Three moments the software was built around.

Documentation workflow

Draft in the workflow. Approve before it files.

Every contact closes with a structured SOAP draft the navigator edits and approves. Clinical-advice language is blocked at generation time. Every AI call is logged with prompt and model version so a reviewer can retrace the decision two years later — without digging through email.

Family PWA

One card. One next step. No password.

Caregivers open the app at 2am. They see one calm sentence, one primary action. Large type, 56×56 tap targets, no streaks, no dark patterns, no red. Installable as a PWA with an offline fallback page when the network is unavailable.

Family PWA card on a phone mockup — one calm serif sentence and one action
GUIDE-billable by default

Every contact, every G-code, every attestation.

Eligibility checks at intake. Tier-aware contact cadence monitoring. Monthly DCMP billing that runs idempotently and exports a billing CSV (G-code and amount per enrollment). Re-running the export is safe — unchanged rows are skipped.

One closed loop

Navigator publishes. Family sees one next step.

The same action that closes documentation updates the caregiver surface — without a chatbot and without a notification flood.

  1. Step 1

    Contact logged

    Navigator closes a call or visit in the console.

  2. Step 2

    AI draft reviewed

    SOAP or visit-prep draft is edited and explicitly approved — never auto-filed.

  3. Step 3

    Family sees one card

    The caregiver opens a magic link and gets one calm next step in the navigator's voice.

GUIDE domains covered

Nine CMS care-delivery domains. Tracked in one console.

From ZBI/CDR/FAST assessments through respite caps, HRSN, and helpline routing — plus navigator training gates and CE records for GUIDE readiness.

Domain details
  • Assessment
  • Care planning
  • 24/7 access
  • Monitoring
  • Coordination
  • Respite
  • Medications
  • Caregiver education
  • Social needs

Security & compliance

HIPAA controls are designed into the workflow.

PHI-bearing production pilots remain gated on signed vendor BAAs, but the product already enforces tenant scope, audit trails, server-side redaction, and human review.

Layered cards naming each compliance primitive in the stack: BAA, RLS, KMS, audit hash chain, session rotation
  • BAA gates

    Microsoft coverage is documented; Clerk, DigitalOcean, DO Inference, and Sentry stay launch blockers until signed BAAs are archived.

  • Tenancy

    Every PHI query is scoped to your tenant and re-verified on every request, so a navigator at Program A is kept out of Program B's data.

  • Keys

    Each program's encryption key is wrapped separately and unwrapped only when needed, held in memory for at most 5 minutes, with rotation that can't leave data half-encrypted.

  • Audit

    Every access and change is written to a tamper-evident audit log — any attempt to alter history breaks the chain, and an auditor can verify it directly.

  • Sessions

    Family magic-link sessions rotate on auth change; HttpOnly + SameSite=Lax + Secure in prod.

  • No third-party analytics on family surface

    No GA, no Mixpanel, no session replay. First-party telemetry only.

Start with one evidence workflow—not a platform replacement.

We are seeking dementia-care programs with a costly, recurring question about whether intended care was actually delivered. A paid, scoped design-partner pilot should prove that value before either side commits to a broader platform rollout.

Validate first

Design-partner pilot

An 8–12 week engagement focused on one pathway, one evidence problem, and one accountable program owner.

Scoped with your team

Priced to case volume, data preparation, and research support.

  • One high-value care pathway and evidence question
  • Baseline workflow and documentation assessment
  • Synthetic or approved de-identified validation data
  • Human-reviewed fidelity benchmark and gap report
  • Executive readout with a continue-or-stop decision

Extend after evidence

Operational platform

Expand the working navigation platform only after the pilot shows measurable value, usable evidence, and an accountable buyer.

Value-based proposal

No permanent public PMPM until willingness to pay is validated.

  • Navigator console and family workflow already implemented
  • Tenant-scoped records, audit trails, and review gates
  • Assessments, plans, contacts, tasks, reporting, and billing support
  • Evidence workflow expanded only after measured pilot value
  • Security and PHI readiness reviewed before production data
Bring us one evidence problem

Paid pilots only. PHI remains blocked until required agreements and controls are complete.

Who this is for

GentleNext is purpose-built for structured dementia care programs, not general caregiving apps.

GUIDE-participating programs

CMS lists 320 active GUIDE participants in a model that runs eight years, through mid-2032 — a durable program, not a closing window. Every aligned patient earns the program a tiered monthly Dementia Care Management Payment, plus up to $2,500/yr in respite. Assessment workflows (CDR, FAST, ZBI, HRSN), DCMP PBPM tracking, five-tier classification, respite cap enforcement, and the GUIDE reporting export run end-to-end today. Billing lines reserve PBA and health-equity adjustment fields; quality-measure PBA math lands with CMS PY2 pay-for-performance (Year 1 remains pay-for-reporting).

Memory-care service lines

Health systems running memory-care outside GUIDE get the same navigator workflows — assessment cadence, caregiver-burden tracking, care plans, family communication — without the CMS G-code reporting and PBPM modules. Same console, narrower compliance surface.

Geriatric practices

Practices with a care-coordination function use GentleNext between visits: post-appointment follow-through, ZBI-tracked caregiver burden, family-side resource handoff, escalation routing to the practice's own on-call. Reduces re-asking the same questions visit-over-visit.

Medicare Advantage dementia programs

MA plans operating dementia-specific supplemental benefits or in-house care-navigation teams use the same workflows their plan-side care managers already follow, with HIPAA-aware tenant scope per plan and a calm family surface their members will actually open. Not employer-side caregiver concierge; plan-operated programs only.

Common questions

About

Built by operators, not platform tourists.

GentleNext is a product of Mahumtech, an engineering studio that ships HIPAA-grade software for regulated healthcare programs. The platform is maintained by a small senior team — clinical advisors, a care navigator, and the engineers who wrote the audit layer — not an outsourced contract shop.

We are pilot-stage and say so out loud. That means we over-invest in launch support, we write detailed compliance briefs for your CISO, and we answer every email within a business day. If you're considering us, expect to talk to the team that wrote the code — not a BDR.

Founded
Houston, Texas, 2022
Stage
Pilot partners, reviewed access

Design-partner conversation

Bring one care-delivery question you cannot answer today.

In 30 minutes, we will test whether GentleNext can reduce the cost of answering it. We can show the implemented navigator and family workflows, then map a proposed evidence pilot. No claim that the fidelity engine is already live; no production PHI is required.

Response time
One business day.

Loading request form…

We keep this to ourselves. No third-party analytics, no lead-enrichment services, no list rentals.